By Michael Stelzer Jocks, History Faculty.
Martin Luther King, a rabble-rousing civil disobedient, is now an American national hero. This statement is obvious. It is fact. But, the lionization of MLK in America today elevates him beyond simply the level of hero. For the vast majority of the country, he is part of a even more exclusive pantheon of great Americans. Paradoxically, we can see this by the use, and misuse, of MLK’s name and memory.
Watch the news. Listen to the political talk-show hacks. Use C-Span to spy on Congress as they argue over some arcane issue. If Martin Luther King’s name comes up in any of these arenas, it is usually because someone
is calling upon his memory to harden their argument into a moral imperative. Or, alternatively, MLK’s memory and beliefs will be used to differentiate a political enemy’s ideals from those of the great Civil Rights leader. In other words, a sanitized, sanctified version of Martin Luther King has become a political weapon. ‘What Would MLK say/think about this?” constantly gets thrown out into the public realm, leading to such ridiculously unanswerable questions as “what would MLK think about assault weapon bans?,’ or, ‘what would MLK believe about the Chick-Fil-A boycott’! The best question, but the one that is never asked is, ‘What would Martin Luther King think about all these ‘What Would MLK think’ queries?”
Though sometimes absurd, or even distasteful, this usage of MLK’s message and life places him into exclusive company. Only a handful of American historical figures are appropriated by the political left and right in this way. In fact, only the nation’s ‘founders’ are called upon as often as King and his legacy.
When the moniker ‘the founders’ gets thrown around in today’s political culture, it usually refers to a small sampling of men who signed the Declaration of Independence, fought the Revolution, and created the Constitution. Though usually not stated outright, it is safe to assume Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Hamilton, and Franklin are the big six. Though historians will tell you that these men disagreed constantly and vociferously about the the meaning of America, twenty-first century Americans gloss over such complexities. When ‘the founders’ are spoken of as a homogeneous bunch, it is usually to justify our political proclivities, or attack political enemies. “What would the founders say about Obamacare?” “What would the founders think about waterboarding?” Picking and choosing the quotes of Jefferson, or Franklin that suit their needs, media personalities and political figures utilize ‘the founders’ to fight today’s political battles.
MLK is now part of this national pantheon. But, in one way at least, MLK is an even more evocative symbol than Jefferson, Adams or Washington. King’s image and visage resonates so brightly not just because of his life, but also his death. Unlike ‘the founders’, MLK is a national martyr. He died for what we understand today as being the best of American ideals. Though ‘the founders’ fought to create the nation, and their lives were often in danger, none of them made the greatest sacrifice for the new republic. (Of course, Hamilton is the exception. He died a 
relatively young man in a violent manner, killed by Aaron Burr in a duel. But, to our twenty-first century eyes, this death, though romantic, was not for the nation, but only for Hamilton’s individual pride and honor.) Most of the first generation of American heroes passed away quietly in their beds. They had cleared their own, and the nation’s hurdles, while alive. They lived to see their dreams made real. MLK died before he reached his ‘promised land.’
But, martyrs die so that others may live. Martyrology means that King’s death caused our collective rebirth. This places MLK in an even more exclusive club. It could be argued there is only one other member: Abraham Lincoln. Both King and Lincoln fit the definition of martyrs as they both died so that others could thrive and survive. Both American heroes foresaw the future far before their contemporaries, and died for this prescience.
As our nation is at fault for the death of these two men, the least we can do is celebrate their births.
The Flâneur's Turtle 